Reviews

Freeq takes a close look at happenings in the worlds of Music, Gigs, Art, Fashion & Nightlife, and we bring it to you in a lovely, easy to read format.

Think you can do better?  Why don't you become a contributor for Freeq and publish your own work?  We're always looking for writers to join our team.  Click here for more info!

Written by Phil Robinson Sunday, 30 October 2011 17:40
Features - Reviews
Attention: open in a new window. PDFPrintE-mail

Halloween; It’s that time of the year when things that go bump in the night surface and everyone loves to scare themselves into a frenzy with a good scary flick, and those horror lovers of us at Freeq magazine was eager to see what was showing at our local Cineworld. Currently showing is the eagerly awaited Paranormal Activity 3 and the latest offering from Del Toro’s dark imagination; Don’t be afraid of the dark.

Don’t be afraid of the dark.

Return of the good old fashioned horror story.

Writer for the film Guillermo Del Toro teams up with first time film director Troy Nixon in this remake of the creepy 1973 version, which told the tale of a woman (Sally) being terrorized by a horde of demonic little creatures living beneath her new home. The new version introduces some new faces, and instead of Sally being a grown woman we meet Sally as a depressed child (Bailee Madison) struggling with her parents split and having to live with her father (Guy Pearce) and his girlfriend (Katie Holmes) .

Essentially this is almost a carbon copy of the original, apart from a clever take on what the creatures really are and a few character changes, and with a cast primarily made up of four people you can understand why it has received mixed reviews. Yes the story is simple and somewhat predictable and the sets are few and far between, but these qualities only help to exploit the real focus of the film which is both the changing relationships of the central three characters and the creatures themselves. What you are left with is (in true Del Torro fashion) is a perfect mix of horror, fantasy and drama and unlike many horror films which rely on bombarding the audience with scares and gore this film slowly and gradually makes you invest time in the characters so by the end of the film you really feel attached and fearful of the climax (which left me breathless).

Initially I was not sure about the choice of actors to play the parent roles, but both Katie Holmes and Guy Pearce played their parts realistically never letting themselves get carried away and melodramatic as the real centre of the creatures attention was on claiming young Sally as their own and Madison was subtly able to portray anger, fear, sadness and love in ever changing situations and environments.

But the real stars of the show here are the little gnarled, quick moving monsters themselves which come across as if plucked right out of a gothic horror tale such as The Brothers Grimm and fit perfectly in the Gothic styled Blackwood Mansion. When I first saw that the creatures were CGI I was expecting them to be disappointing and unrealistic. However instead of having the creatures in full view the little critters are for the most part only glimpsed at scurrying and climbing various darker corners of the house which only heightens the intrigue and pure pleasure when they eventually come out at night causing their own violent mischief. Even when they are not seen in full your attention is pinned on the creatures whispering voices coming from the grating in the floor which add to them having their own persona and not just a monster that looks nasty; these are vindictive nasty beings.

Unfortunately a film like this which chooses not to obey the predictable rules of horror films come to pass is doomed to receive criticism, and if you are looking for a terrifying horror film that is dark and disturbing then you are definitely going to be disappointed. Make no mistake this film is not perfect, but if you are willing to broaden your view and accept the eclectic mix of drama fairy tale fantasy and horror then you will find yourself pleasantly surprised.

 

Paranormal activity 3

Not a masterpiece but absolutely terrifying!

The ill-fated sisters are back in the third instalment of paranormal activity and like all good trilogies, this film goes right back to the roots to tie up some loose ends from the first two films. The story is simple and if you have watched the first two then you know exactly what you are getting yourself in for. Set back in the late 1980’s the film follows Katie and Kristi as young girls plagued by the nasty presence Kristy likes to call Toby (her aggressive imaginary friend!).

As with the first two films we are once again given the same slow build-up of unbearable tension, raw home camera work, neat subtle and convincing special effects and quality acting from everyone involved. The creators of this franchise have found the perfect blend of horror and tension by stripping it all down to its bare essentials so that you really feel as though you are part of a real experience.

The scare aspect is one of the main elements that keep these films alive and I was really worried it was going to be much of the same that we have already seen, but the film takes on board what has previously been offered and builds on it. We have the more of objects being thrown around, lifted, moved and smashed aspect. We have more of ghostly looking apparitions being spotted on camera that are there one second then gone the next, but this time we have a dialogue and a disturbing relationship that seems to be taking place primarily between Kristi (featured in the second film) and the spectre in question. The entity seems to know what it wants and expresses its wishes more overtly and earlier on than in the first two films (a wise move as we the audience knows the formula and want to get right to it).

There are also more ‘jump out of your seat’ scenes happening but not too many that they distract from the tension that maintains all the way through until the films climax, and these give a nice sudden change of pace that scares without ruining the film. We welcome back the much loved hand held camera, night camera and here we see the new addition: the oscillating camera. This is a great new way of maintaining tension by panning an empty room one second then on its second rotation of the same room there is of course something waiting in the shadows. The silent aspect of the film and the long drawn out camera pans of each room In the night is just as terrifying, not knowing what next is going leap out at you; what you don’t see is just as scary.

Unlike the previous films the two characters the apparition is focused on are helpless children (who both play their parts very convincingly). Unlike adult characters who can to some degree find ways to cope and communicate their fears, the two children become increasingly vulnerable and unable to fight back or even comprehend the seriousness of what is happening. The two adult leads also portray a believable relationship which cleverly reminds us of Mika and Katie in the first film, possibly a conscious decision to cast Christopher Nicholas Smith who bears an uncanny resemblance to the character of Micah.

The other reason why these films haven’t died out is that each film offers new insights into the family history of the sisters which builds on the overall mythology. What you get are three individual films split over different timelines, each with unanswered threads that are tied up in any of the other two films. It almost appears as though this was one long film chopped and reassembles into three films then presented to us backwards leaving you to connect the dots and make some of your own conclusions, which is partly the joy and will leave you talking about all three after the credits (as well as turning on all the lights when you get home).

Horror fans will love it, everyone else find should find a safe warm place to hide!

Written by Phil Robinson Wednesday, 07 September 2011 21:54
Features - Reviews
Attention: open in a new window. PDFPrintE-mail
Fangs but no bite
Directed by relatively unknown Craig Gillespie, Fright Night stars Anton Yelchin  as geek turned young vampire hunter (‘Charley Brewster’), squaring off against an over sexed Colin Farrell as ‘Jerry’ the blood sucker in question, and trying to protect his girlfriend ‘Amy’ (Imogen Poots) from becoming Jerry’s vampire bride to be. We know the formula and have seen it countless times before, but if you’re a fan of the 1985 original then you will probably appreciate this reworking.
Farrell seems a perfect choice for the pale skinned sexual predator role and he seems to really enjoy himself playing Jerry, and it’s refreshing to see a vampire minus the angst and heartache that we have come to see with other recent fluffy vampire films. Tennant is also fun to watch as an eccentric, bad mannered Peter Vincent, and Christopher Mintz-Plasse is perfectly chosen as ‘Evil Ed’ the vampire obsessed nerdy best friend of Charley. It’s a good job that these performances are entertainingly flamboyant as without them the film would seriously fail to deliver. The rest of the cast seem to totally transparent and pointless especially Toni Collette as Charley’s mum who seems to be there one second then gone for the remainder of the film, and doesn’t seem at all phased that her new neighbour is a creature of the night.
Although there are some mildly suspenseful points and clever action sequences, the film is lacking in genuine suspense, thrills and frights and missing much in the way of plot or backstory to the main villain who is really just an evil alluring stage presence. The emphasis of this film seems to be the fact that another old cult classic has been given the contemporary treatment with an eclectic cast (much in the same vain as the rehashed Disturbia film), shame as the concept for this remake had a lot of potential. Fright Night will probably be a hit with a younger generation rediscovering the tongue in cheek vampire-thriller genre, similarly to how the original became a cult hit in the eighties. But for the rest of us this film will be easily forgettable with nothing new to offer.
Having all said and done this is still an enjoyable film to watch that remains true to the original version and films of this genre where the vampires are actually evil killers without remorse. With some nice camera work, special effects and score, you will probably enjoy this for what it is; a slick trendy but shallow comedy horror that delivers exactly what you would expect but not a great deal more.
Fangs but no bite..
Directed by relatively unknown Craig Gillespie, Fright Night stars Anton Yelchin  as geek turned young vampire hunter (‘Charley Brewster’), squaring off against an over sexed Colin Farrell as ‘Jerry’ the blood sucker in question, and trying to protect his girlfriend ‘Amy’ (Imogen Poots) from becoming Jerry’s vampire bride to be. We know the formula and have seen it countless times before, but if you’re a fan of the 1985 original then you will probably appreciate this reworking.
Farrell seems a perfect choice for the pale skinned sexual predator role and he seems to really enjoy himself playing Jerry, and it’s refreshing to see a vampire minus the angst and heartache that we have come to see with other recent fluffy vampire films. Tennant is also fun to watch as an eccentric, bad mannered Peter Vincent, and Christopher Mintz-Plasse is perfectly chosen as ‘Evil Ed’ the vampire obsessed nerdy best friend of Charley. It’s a good job that these performances are entertainingly flamboyant as without them the film would seriously fail to deliver. The rest of the cast seem to totally transparent and pointless especially Toni Collette as Charley’s mum who seems to be there one second then gone for the remainder of the film, and doesn’t seem at all phased that her new neighbour is a creature of the night.
Although there are some mildly suspenseful points and clever action sequences, the film is lacking in genuine suspense, thrills and frights and missing much in the way of plot or backstory to the main villain who is really just an evil alluring stage presence. The emphasis of this film seems to be the fact that another old cult classic has been given the contemporary treatment with an eclectic cast (much in the same vain as the rehashed Disturbia film), shame as the concept for this remake had a lot of potential. Fright Night will probably be a hit with a younger generation rediscovering the tongue in cheek vampire-thriller genre, similarly to how the original became a cult hit in the eighties. But for the rest of us this film will be easily forgettable with nothing new to offer.
Having all said and done this is still an enjoyable film to watch that remains true to the original version and films of this genre where the vampires are actually evil killers without remorse. With some nice camera work, special effects and score, you will probably enjoy this for what it is; a slick trendy but shallow comedy horror that delivers exactly what you would expect but not a great deal more.
Written by Phil Robinson Tuesday, 16 August 2011 22:40
Features - Reviews
Attention: open in a new window. PDFPrintE-mail
With banners advertising J.J Abrams and Steven Spielberg above its title, and hailed as an instant classic who can blame you for feeling the hype at the Release of Super Eight? However the film just doesn’t quite hit the spot in claiming its place amongst the classics.
Set in a sleepy suburban American town in the late 70s, super eight follows the events after a group of young ambitious film makers witness a terrible train crash, and start to unravel the mystery of what exactly was on the train along with investigating a series of local disappearances.
After riding the success of films such as Star Trek and Cloverfield, Abrams is here taking the helm as writer and director of this sci-fi, almost B movie type of adventure and definitely has some of his trademark style. However if you are familiar with producer Spielberg’s classic films from the eighties, then you will most certainly find yourself experiencing a major case of déjà vu. Super Eight suffers from the ‘seen it all before’ syndrome and rarely offers us up anything new to get our jaws into. The theme of ‘young boy meets supernatural force and military figure bent on claiming it as his own’ is iconic, but here becomes repetitive with nothing to set it aside from such classics as the iron giant or ET.
That is not to say this is bad film. The acting is some of the finest I have seen amongst a cast primarily made up of youngsters (often outshining the talents of the older actors). Newcomer Joel Courtney does a fantastic job in his part as ‘Joe Lamb’; a boy struggling to connect with his ever distant father, whilst Elle fanning as ‘Alice Dainard’  steals the spotlight as the object of Joe’s schoolboy crush who gives us probably one of the most heartfelt and convincing crying scenes I have seen from someone so young. The rest of the supporting cast are all excellent fun to watch; they have a natural flow of interaction with each other and witty/punchy dialogue that is reminiscent of the group of kids in The Goonies.
This film also looks stunning, from the seventies style and setting to the cinematography and special effects, which pay homage to films such as ET and close encounters of the third kind. I personally loved the flared lens effects throughout the film which you may recognise as being a favourite lighting effect of Abrams in the recent Star Trek film and gave Super Eight a stylised glossy feel. There are also some real standout sequences such as the initial train crash which had my eyes glued to the screen as train carriages were mercilessly thrown off the tracks towards our young main stars running for shelter.
With so much to fall in love with in this film it is a surprise and a disappointment that there was such a feeling of dissatisfaction at the credits.  Abrams seems to be juggling several different sub plots here whether it be a strained father son relationship, a childhood romance, a malevolent alien force or a military threat, none of which seem to sit comfortably with each other. Constant shifts in the films main focus leaves you struggling to reconnect and keep up with what is happening, and as a result the films pacing becomes disjointed. I thought I had missed something when all of a sudden the actors seem to jump into action mode rushing to get to the films over clichéd and predictable climax. Although sweet and sentimental at times this film doesn’t know what it wants to be or tries to be everything we loved in Spielberg’s old films all at once.
If it wasn’t for the fact this film has charm oozing out of every scene it could easily be dismissed as just another sci fi adventure flick for the kids. Entertaining? Yes, ground-breaking? Definitely not. Some may argue that it’s a classy homage to an era and style of film we came to know and love as kids; others would say complete money making rip off of old favourites, which anyone over a certain age would yawn at. I tend to agree with the latter. Super eight is more of an average eight!
With banners advertising J.J Abrams and Steven Spielberg above its title, and hailed as an instant classic who can blame you for feeling the hype at the Release of Super Eight? However the film just doesn’t quite hit the spot in claiming its place amongst the classics.
Set in a sleepy suburban American town in the late 70s, super eight follows the events after a group of young ambitious film makers witness a terrible train crash, and start to unravel the mystery of what exactly was on the train along with investigating a series of local disappearances.
After riding the success of films such as Star Trek and Cloverfield, Abrams is here taking the helm as writer and director of this sci-fi, almost B movie type of adventure and definitely has some of his trademark style. However if you are familiar with producer Spielberg’s classic films from the eighties, then you will most certainly find yourself experiencing a major case of déjà vu. Super Eight suffers from the ‘seen it all before’ syndrome and rarely offers us up anything new to get your jaws into. The theme of ‘young boy meets supernatural force and military figure bent on claiming it as his own’ is iconic, but here becomes repetitive with nothing to set it aside from such classics as the iron giant or ET.
That is not to say this is bad film. The acting is some of the finest I have seen amongst a cast primarily made up of youngsters (often outshining the talents of the older actors). Newcomer Joel Courtney does a fantastic job in his part as ‘Joe Lamb’; a boy struggling to connect with his ever distant father, whilst Elle fanning as ‘Alice Dainard’  steals the spotlight as the object of Joe’s schoolboy crush who gives us probably one of the most heartfelt and convincing crying scenes I have seen from someone so young. The rest of the supporting cast are all excellent fun to watch; they have a natural flow of interaction with each other and witty/punchy dialogue that is reminiscent of the group of kids in The Goonies.
This film also looks stunning, from the seventies style and setting to the cinematography and special effects, which pay homage to films such as ET and close encounters of the third kind. I personally loved the flared lens effects throughout the film which you may recognise as being a favourite lighting effect of Abrams in the recent Star Trek film and gave Super Eight a stylised glossy feel. There are also some real standout sequences such as the initial train crash which had my eyes glued to the screen as train carriages were mercilessly thrown off the tracks towards our young main stars running for shelter.
With so much to fall in love with in this film it is a surprise and a disappointment that there was such a feeling of dissatisfaction at the credits.  Abrams seems to be juggling several different sub plots here whether it be a strained father son relationship, a childhood romance, a malevolent alien force or a military threat, none of which seem to sit comfortably with each other. Constant shifts in the films main focus leaves you struggling to reconnect and keep up with what is happening, and as a result the films pacing becomes disjointed. I thought I had missed something when all of a sudden the actors seem to jump into action mode rushing to get to the films over clichéd and predictable climax. Although sweet and sentimental at times this film doesn’t know what it wants to be or tries to be everything we loved in Spielberg’s old films all at once.
If it wasn’t for the fact this film has charm oozing out of every scene it could easily be dismissed as just another sci fi adventure flick for the kids. Entertaining? Yes, ground-breaking? Definitely not. Some may argue that it’s a classy homage to an era and style of film we came to know and love as kids; others would say complete money making rip off of old favourites, which anyone over a certain age would yawn at. I tend to agree with the latter.
Super eight is more of an average eight!
Written by Anna Lucas Tuesday, 09 August 2011 16:49
Features - Reviews
Attention: open in a new window. PDFPrintE-mail

Picture the scene: a storm over the small fishing village of Petrcane in Croatia brought Soundwave festival’s outdoor music to a close for a couple of hours, and acts from the main stage were moved into Barbarellas nightclub on site.  Once it was safe to start everything up again, people emerged from the club slightly subdued and took shelter from the drizzling rain in Tiki bar, situated next to the beach.  From the Beach Bar DJ box, some slow soul started up, courtesy of Floating Points, prompting people to move out onto the rain soaked dance floor overlooking the beach.  As the weather cleared, Floating Points began to pick up the pace and sneak in some seriously funky beats, while festival goers danced down to fill the floor and beach below.  What followed was a kaleidoscope of music that subtly incorporated deep and boogie house plus much more besides; Floating Points placing layer after layer of sound upon an ever-changing bouncy then dirty bass.  After the disappointment of the afternoon’s washout, an overwhelmed crowd became lost in this amazing eclectic set, whilst Floating Points danced round the DJ box selecting his next records (major respect to a DJ dedicated enough to bring his beloved vinyl all the way to Croatia).

Floating Points, aka 24 year old Sam Shepherd began his DJing career when he won a competition based on a mix he had done, the prize of which was to DJ with Andy C at the fantastic London club The End, which sadly closed in January 2009.  These days when he’s not DJing worldwide, you will find Floating Points at his monthly residency at Plastic People in London, where he has recently played sets with Mr Scruff and DJ Nature.

Shepherd is a trained musician, having studied jazz piano and composition, and fronts 14 piece live band the Floating Points Ensemble, who released their debut single ‘Post Suite’ on Ninja Tune in December 2010 after winning ‘Maida Vale Session of the Year 2010’ at Gilles Peterson’s prestigious Worldwide Awards.

Shepherd has also produced guest mixes for Gilles Peterson, Benji B and Mary Anne Hobbs and his work has been on playlists worldwide since his debut release in February 2009 of a remix of Reel 2 Reel’s ‘Love Me Like This’.  Other work includes the ‘Vacuum’ EP, an electronic, synthy mix of sounds (including his parent’s hoover) and this year the funky, wonky beats of ‘Marilyn’ and cool mix of soundscapes in ‘Sais (Dub)’.  Shepherd’s ‘Vacuum Boogie’ also won Track of the Year 2010 at Gilles Peterson’s Worldwide Awards.  On top of all this, Shepherd is currently studying a PhD in Neuroscience at UCL (University College London).

Shepherd was at Soundwave as part of Eglo Records, which he co-founded with Rinse FM DJ Alexander Nut and has also produced for Eglo family member and gorgeous voice Fatima.  All in all, Floating Points is one bright spark worth watching and listening out for.

Page 1 of 8

Current Issue

Banner